It's all about the answers!

Ask a question
QuestionsTagsUsersBadges
Guidelines | FAQ
Follow this question
Question details

×10,951
×4,710

question asked: Jun 01 '17, 1:11 a.m.
question was seen: 1,864 times
last updated: Jun 02 '17, 11:08 a.m.

Related questions

how to restrict a user to create duplicate test case in RQM

0
sousan hussain (29●12●54) | asked Jun 01 '17, 1:11 a.m.

How can I restrict user from performing duplicate test case in RQM. I want to STOP users from doing so.

Accepted answer

0
permanent link
Dawn McMannama (51●5) | answered Jun 01 '17, 10:13 a.m.

 Are you referring to the "copy" or "clone" test case features?

sousan hussain selected this answer as the correct answer
Comments
sousan hussain commented Jun 02 '17, 3:11 a.m.

Yes, I want to restrict a user to create duplicate test case

Dawn McMannama commented Jun 02 '17, 11:08 a.m.

  Cloning can only be enabled if Global Configuration is enabled.


If Global Configuration is enabled and you want to prevent a specific role from cloning artifacts:
1)  Click the "Admin" wheel in the upper right hand side of the screen.
2)  Select "Manage This Project Area".
3)  On the left side of the screen, select "Permissions".
4)  Select a role.
5)  On the right hand side is the list of permissions that can be set.
6)  Disable permission for "Clone Artifacts".

For Copy , I couldn't find any permissions to stop copying, except to prevent the role from "Saving" the various test artifacts. But that will prevent the role from creating and saving the test artifacts.

Maybe someone else knows a way to allow a role to create test artifacts, but prevent the copy feature.

One other answer

Most liked answers ↑|Newest answers|Oldest answers

0
permanent link
Ralph Schoon (63.3k●3●36●46) | answered Jun 01 '17, 6:54 a.m.
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR / FORUM MODERATOR / JAZZ DEVELOPER

 What would detect how, that a test case is a duplicate?

Your answer

Register or to post your answer.


Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.