It's all about the answers!

Ask a question
QuestionsTagsUsersBadges
Guidelines | FAQ
Follow this question
Question details

×42,859
×1,572

question asked: Sep 18 '23, 9:26 a.m.
question was seen: 306 times
last updated: Sep 19 '23, 8:53 a.m.

Related questions

How is the sorting algorithm for "Planned For" realized

0
Rene Beck (56●1●1●4) | asked Sep 18 '23, 9:26 a.m.
edited Sep 19 '23, 8:53 a.m.

We've created a simple query in EWM to view all items over different iterations.

When executing the query and set it to "Ascending" sorting for "Planned For" the sorting of the results looks strange, because it's neither alphabetical nor by Start or End Date of the iteration.




Can somebody tell me the real sorting criteria behind this?

Thanks in advance for your support!

René

Comments
Ralph Schoon commented Sep 19 '23, 7:44 a.m.
FORUM ADMINISTRATOR / FORUM MODERATOR / JAZZ DEVELOPER

I am not sure how the sorting of planned for is done. I just would like to remind that in work item queries, there is only an option to sort ascending and descending. It does not say alphabetical. 

Rene Beck commented Sep 19 '23, 8:53 a.m.

Thanks for the hint Ralph. I've corrected the issue description. 

Be the first one to answer this question!

Register or to post your answer.


Dashboards and work items are no longer publicly available, so some links may be invalid. We now provide similar information through other means. Learn more here.